Bacteria
have to use chemotaxis in mobility search patterns for locating nutrient
sources, arranging themselves in chemical gradients and to initiate
pathogenesis. There are 4 known search patterns: run and reverse,
run and tumble, straight swimming and the recently described 3-step run,
reverse and flick technique. Previous studies show V. alginolyticus uses “3-step flick” to
enter nutrient rich zones.
Majority evidence suggests that bacteria
utilise one search strategy per species, with marine bacteria most commonly utilising
run and reverse. However, in this paper V. coralliilyticus is
shown to demonstrate the three search strategies of run and reverse, straight
swimming and 3 step flick.
The
3 step flick is like a combination of run and tumble, and run and reverse
tactics, allowing the re-examination of nutrient areas with reverse movement,
but paired with a beneficial 90 degree flick, altering orientation of the
microbe, increasing the probability of entering desirable environments.
V. coralliilyticus
is a pathogen reliant on chemotaxis to invade organisms such as corals. This 3
flick technique is thought to allow V.
coralliilyticus to navigate the
differing mediums of corals (water, mucus and tissue cells). Turbulent waters
in the marine environments cause constant flux of variables affecting V. coralliilyticus. Nutrient levels
change diurnally and nocturnally while oxygen saturation in coral tissues flips
to extreme highs (250%) and lows (<2%). Water around the coral stays at a
constant, only layers of 1mm on the surface of the coral tissue changing with
light and dark conditions.
The
authors investigate how V.
coralliilyticus’ search patterns change relative to fluctuating oxygen gradients.
An
observation chamber was set up, where the centre of the slide was highly anoxic
and the edges oxic. V. coralliilyticus
was shown to exhibit more flick-search patterns in the oxic conditions, and
more run and reverse techniques in anoxic conditions.
The
chemotaxic search pattern behaviour of this bacterium changed over the
oxic-anoxic interface, identified over a microscope transect.
When
entering the anoxic environment there was a significant decrease in 3 step
flick behaviour, though over all no preferences were found for search patterns
in oxic and anoxic conditions.
This
lead to the conclusion that V.
Coralliitycus can use both search patterns in both anoxic and anoxic
conditions while maintaining search pattern velocities over the oxic-anoxic
intersect.
The
relationship between oxygen saturation and a bacterium flick or non-flick
response is still unknown. The authors discuss that the 3-flick mechanism could
be either triggered oxygen saturation (as seen in Escherichia coli) – or perhaps due to bacteria monitoring changes
in the electron transfer rate via redox sensors through sensory pathways (the
sensory system can convert environmental signals directly into rotational
changes of the flagella motor). Further research should investigate the actual
mechanisms behind these actions.
One
criticism of this paper is the short discussion that does not segregate the
results to infer meaning to the reader. Leading to statements that could be construed
as misleading such as the “3-step flick”. Is present in oxygenated environments
and not in deoxygenated” – though this may infer to statistical differences in
data there are still trends that should not be ignored. Having said this, it is
still useful paper as it is one of the first to investigate a relationship
between oxygen and 3-flick search patterns.
Further
research could be focused on how temperature affects the “3-step flick” due to
the temperature dependence of this micro-organism. Secondly it would be
interesting to repeat this experiment with more extreme oxygen saturation
levels/gradients, with perhaps more sophisticated methods in place. It may also
be useful to investigate V. coralliiticus
response to oxygen saturation in light and dark settings, to see whether any
search pattern behaviours are influenced by this factor – perhaps shedding
light on whether infection of coral is nocturnal or diurnal specific.
Winn, K. M., Bourne, D. G., & Mitchell, J. G. (2013). Vibrio coralliilyticus Search Patterns across an Oxygen Gradient. PloS one, 8(7), e67975.
Adam Battishill & Caroline White
What strikes me is how two-dimensional our understanding of bacterial motility patterns is, yet marine bacteria live in a three-dimensional world. For example, I doubt that bacteria ever truly move in straight lines; they are probably moving in 3D spirals. Have the motility patterns described only been observed in between glass slides?; Could these patterns be a product of limited motility because of experimental design?
ReplyDelete