Coral reefs are some
of the most diverse and important ecosystem in the world. They are structurally
and environmentally complex habitats that accommodate a range of microbial
communities as that have a large number of niches, from surface layer mucus to
the various tissue layers. This investigation considers the antifungal and
antimicrobial properties of the culturable fungi in South China Sea gorgonian
corals. Even in scleractinian corals, this was a poorly understood area with an
inadequate scattering of articles throughout the literature. Present data
suggests that there is a strong fungal association with Gorgonians that are
noted for both their anti-pathological and pathogenic properties. For example, Aspergillus sydowii is known to cause
diseases in both West Indian and Caribbean Gorgonians. However, evidence is
mixed, as some species of fungus found on diseased corals have transversely also
been found on healthy corals. Therefore this investigation is important as it provides
further general understanding of the fungal diversity and ecology of
gorgonians.
3-5 samples of
healthy D. gemmacea, E. aurantiaca, M.
squamata, M. felxuosa, S. suberosa and V.
umbraculum were collected from the South China Sea and placed in sterile
plastic bags.
These samples were
then cut into pieces and homogenized. A ten-fold dilution was made and plated.
These were then incubated until the morphology of the fungi could be
distinguished. These fungi were then isolated and incubated on there own plates.
Six different isolation media were used to isolate the fungi of the gorgonians.
The growth of bacteria was prohibited using benzylpenicillin and rose Bengal.
DNA was extracted
from selected fungi strains and PCR was used to amplify the ITS sequences using
primers ITS1 and ITS4. These were then amplified. The sequencing was then
corrected using Sequencher and BLASTed to assign a species name.
In order to
determine the antimicrobial properties, isolated fungi were grown on PDA agar
(potato glucose agar). These inoculated plates were then spread with five
indicator microorganisms; M. luteus, P.
piscida, V. alginolyticus, A. versicolor and A. sydowii. The antimicrobial/fungal activity was expressed as the diameter
of growth inhibition zone. Three repeats were carried out for each isolate.
Results indicate
that 208 fungal species were isolated from the six coral species, 127 of which
were isolated for analysis. BLAST analysis showed that 121 isolates were from
20 genera. Penicillium was the most
common genus whilst Aspergillus was
the most diverse. The most abundant fungi were A. sydowii, P. citrinum and
P. oxalicum however the other fungi were
only isolated once. The coral D. gemmacea
had the highest fungal isolates whilst E.
aurantiaca had the least. Of the six isolating media tested PDA yielded the
highest isolates but GYMA (glucose yeast malt agar) had the highest recovery (does anyone know the difference?). Some
fungi could only be isolated on specific agar such as A. niger, A. tubingensis and
F. proliferatum could only be
isolated on SYA (starch yeast agar). There were many other fungal species which
occur in very small numbers and were not included in this study. Lastly, 38% of
the 121 strains analysed exhibited antimicrobial/fungal properties, with the
majority isolated from D. gemmacea
and E. aurantiaca. Most were reported
to exhibit strong activity.
There are few
reports of fungi associated with gorgonian corals, this is especially true in
the South China Sea. Of the 20 genera isolated 12 were new reports in for
marine corals. This report strengthen previous reports that gorgonians have a
rich and diverse fungal community, however Apergillus
and Penicillium were the most common
which have also been found in scleractinian corals and marine invertabrates. This
paper suggests that sample size, fragment size, the method of tissue processing
and tissue collection all influence the results of fungal isolation. The
communities found within the six gorgonians varied greatly between each other. It
was suggested that this is due to the various gorgonian morphology. However,
when these results were compared to the same coral species in Singapore, the
fungal communities significantly varied from the South China Sea coral
communities. This suggests that gorgonian coral species at different locations
have various fungal communities and that the environment differences may
provide some evidence for this variation. The different medias used yielded
different results in terms of fungal isolation. Although past studies indicate
that not more than 2 agar media would be sufficient in harbouring all fungal
species, this paper suggests using multiple isolation media to fully isolate all
present fungi. Finally, 38% of the fungi isolated were shown to produce an
antimicrobial/fungal activity. This is supported by various other reports that
have found new sources of biotechnological products to be used in the
antifouling, anti-fungal and antimicrobial industries.
In conclusion this
paper is significant as it provides evidence for an improved method in the isolation
of gorgonian coral fungi, suggests that the diversity of these fungi is mostly
untapped and unknown and that the microorganisms may be able to provide
significant natural products for use in
the commercial world.
Zhang X, Bao J, Wang
G, He F, Xu X & Qi S. 2012. Diversity and Antimicrobial Activity of
Culturable Fungi Isolated from Six Species of the South China Sea Gorgonians, Microb. Ecol. 64: 617-627.
This is an interesting outlook on fungal communities...you mentioned that there was mixed evidence on the anti-pathogenic or pathogenic properties of some species of fungus, could this be due to using different sample sites to study the community composition, and difference in species predominance (or even species richness) of fungi in the Gorgonian corals? As I found another similar study by Zuluaga-Montero et al. (2010) that looked at how spatial variation affected the fungal species richness in Gorgonian sea fans in the Caribbean. They found that there was higher mycoflora in nearshore waters than offshore, as ocean circulation could dilute the seawater further away from the coast. Even within the same geographic region, there were differences, so it seems to me that this study needed more refine sampling locations in order to actively compare fungal diversity in Gorgonian corals.
ReplyDeleteIn addition, they found that fungal species richness wasn't correlated with the prevalence of aspergillosis (also attributed to Aspergillus sydowii), but seemed to occur more when there were higher numbers of fungal strains, so the disease is most likely caused by multiple opportunistic pathogens. I wondered from reading both this older paper and your review, whether corals only become infected by the disease when A. sydowi (and other opportunistic fungi) are predominant in the community depending on the location, and hence local environmental conditions, of the Gorgonians. I thought this because Zuluaga-Montero et al. (2010) also point out that the mycoflora of both healthy and diseased sea fans differed among sites.
I'm sure that different sampling sites would definitely have an effect on pathogenic/anti-pathogenic fungi in corals as, obviously, different sites have various abiotic differences which will effect the fungi communities on the corals. However, I'm more inclined to believe that perhaps age/health of a coral would have a more significant correlation on the pathogenic/anti-pathogenic fungi found on a coral species. Fungi are renown detritivores/pathogens themselves so it wouldn't surprise me if stressed corals lacked the anti-pathogenic fungi inhabiting the niche of a pathogenic one (however, it would be hard to determine the direction of this. Is the fungi causing the stress or the stress causing the fungi). To some extent, the sampling site could be significant here as some sites might be more polluted/turbid than others. I'd like to find out more about this...
ReplyDelete