During the last 60
years plastics have become one of the major sources of pollution on the planet
and with annual production of plastic globally being approximately 245 metric
tonnes per year this problem is likely to continue. It is hardly surprising then that some of this discarded
plastic finds its way into our oceans, accumulating on our beaches and also in
the centre of ocean gyres where it is held by currents. This paper looks at the effect that
these accumulations of plastic have on microbial communities, in particular
they are concerned about the longevity of plastic within the oceans when
compared to more natural substances such as wood.
Zetter and his team
were particularly interested in the plastic accumulation in the North Atlantic
Subtropical Gyre as it does not appear to have increased in size since 1980
despite the rate at which plastic is being disposed of. Given that the hydrophobic surface of
the plastic promotes microbial colonisation and biofilm formation this study
wanted to show that the microbial communities found on the plastic would be
distinct from those found in the surrounding waters.
Sampling and Visual
Identification.
Three types of sample
were taken: a sample of seawater surrounding the plastic debris, pieces of
polyethylene (PE) and pieces of polypropylene (PP). The plastic chosen for the sample are two of the most common
used in commercial packaging. After
fixing the plastic samples were inspected using Scanning Electron Microscopy
(SEM) which revealed 50 different morphotypes of eukaryotic and bacterial cells living on both types of plastic. The two most common organisms were diatoms and filaments
however the third most common which is as yet unidentified was found embedded
in pits on the surface of the plastic.
Molecular Analysis
Through molecular
analysis it was shown that there were distinct communities associated with each
type of plastic and the seawater, (Fig 1). For the communities within the plastic the data showed the presence
of phototrophes such as the cyanobacteria Phormidium
and Rivularia, biofilm forming
species including Navicula and Nitzschia. Vibrio species
were also detected within the community but on the rRNA sequences used it was
not possible to fully identify which species were present giving rise to
concerns that the Vibrio strains
could be harmful to humans or animals, this is of greater concern given the
length of time that plastic can remain in the ocean and the distances it may
cover.
Figure 1.
Venn diagram showing bacterial OTU overlap for pooled PP, PE, and
seawater samples; n = number of sequenced reads per group. Numbers inside the
circles represent the number of shared of unique OTU’s for a gives substrate.
Of particular interest
were the bacteria found only on the plastics that were known to be capable of
degrading hydrocarbons. These were
shown to be part of a widespread network within the microbial community linking
to other microbes that have previously been found in areas of hydrocarbon
contamination. Together with the
visual examination of the plastic which showed individual cells embedded in
pits within the plastic, this suggests that they may be working as a whole to
possibly providing a sink for the recalcitrant carbon which is held on these
plastic islands.
It will be interesting
to follow the journey that this research team takes as it tries to establish if
the microbial communities found within the plastic debris could be the solution
to the problem.
Zettler, E. R., Mincer, T. J., &
Amaral-Zettler, L. A. (2013). Life in the ‘Plastisphere’: Microbial communities
on plastic marine debris. Environmental science & technology.
This paper has attracted quite a lot of media interest as the idea of microbes digesting our plastic waste is obviously appealing. But, to my knowledge, none has ever convincingly shown large scale degradation. Do you think the association of particular bacteria with the 'pits' observed in the EM is enough evidence to suggest degradation?
ReplyDeleteHi Colin,
DeleteI don't think the 'pits' alone are enough evidence to suggest degradation, but the presence of known hydrocarbon degrading species and the fact that the species differ between the types of plastic is certainly intriguing. From the images within the paper it does also appear that the pits are closely fitted to the cells that are inside them and not just part of the uneven surface. I will certainly be keeping my eyes open for the next paper to see where this research goes.
Hi Lucy, this is an interesting article and I know Rich Boden is keen to progress research into microbial degradation of plastics further. A paper is currently in press confirming the presence of microplastics in the deep sea (Van Cauwenberghe et al., (2013) Microplastic pollution in deep-sea sediments. Environmental Pollution) and an interesting concept is that the deep sea may be a sink for plastic fragments, facilitated by microbe & microbial exudate adhesion.
ReplyDeleteHi Rachel,
DeleteI've just read that paper and find it interesting that they have now found these particles. In 2010, (Law et al) data from the oceanic flux program particle traps in the center of the high plastic region near Bermuda showed no evidence of plastic as a substantial contributor to trapped sinking material at depths of 500 to 3200m. Although this was a different sampling method and was focusing on the seawater below the pollution zone rather than the sediment.
Perhaps with further research it will allow a timeline to be determined showing the journey of these plastic particles which seem unfortunately to be getting everywhere.
As far as I am aware polyethylene, at least, has a pretty complicated surface structure with indentations and pits forming as part of the breakdown process (photdegradation or wave action etc.), which is why it is such an effective vehicle for the concentration and transport of hydrophobic contaminants such as PAHs. Could these microbes associated with the pits not be breaking down other chemicals that are sorbed to the plastic rather than the plastics themselves?
ReplyDeleteHi George,
ReplyDeleteI agree the plastics do have a complicated surface anyway, but the cells in the image shown in the abstract of the paper in particular do appear to be very well 'fitted' into the pits which does make it look as though the cells are eating into it. As i mentioned to colin i do not believe this is enough evidence on its own and I suppose it could be as you suggest that they are breaking down something also on the surface and perhaps it is a byproduct of that creating the pits. only time and further testing will tell.