Fierer et al used the
bacterial diversity on 51 volunteers’ palms to discover the variability between
the hands of an individual and the variability between individuals. There is a
huge array of bacteria found upon the surface of the human body, with each area
of the body having it’s own unique community of microbes. The presence of a community is dictated by
frequency of skin shedding, UV exposure, host anti-microbial defence, moisture
availability and exposure to detergents and soaps. This study was conducted upon
the dominant and non-dominant hands of each volunteer (handedness).
The 16S rNA genes were amplified using PCR techniques,
before being analysed using a pyro-sequencing run; this was conducted for each
palm of each volunteer. This technique,
coupled with various bar-coding techniques, provided the most comprehensive
dataset of a human skin bacteria diversity to date.
The study found
that the average human palm contains >150 distinct species-level bacteria. This is a radical difference to previous
studies which are noted by the author to have been largely under-estimated. The
bacterial richness found in the swabs from a palm were >3 times higher than
previous swabs conducted on elbow and forearm skin. It was hypothesized that the increased bacterial
diversity and richness may be due to inoculation due to contact with the surrounding
environment though it was suggested that the depth of the survey, which
produced rarer bacteria often un-documented, was the root-cause of the
heightened richness and diversity. The
results were compared with a previous study that documented the diversity of the
throat, stomach and fecal bacteria, collected using similar pyro-techniques;
the palms were found to be higher.
The most abundant genera
were found to be Proprionbacterium,
Streptococcus, Staphylococcus, Corynebacterium and Lactobacillus which accounted
for 94% of the total population. These
are believed to be the most common skin residents. The other genera were deemed to be either
transient, short-term residents or permanent residents that were simply present
in low quantities or were only present due to specific host factors.
Despite
similarities, across the 102 palms swabbed, 4,742 distinct bacterial phylotypes
were documented; only 5 of which were shared across all hands, showing a huge
range of inter-variability. There was a
significant difference in the communities found on the dominant and
non-dominant hands, with the dominant hand having a very different community to
the non-dominant hand.
The sex of the
volunteer was also found to significantly affect the diversity and abundance of
bacteria, with women harbouring 1573% more abundance of several species. Women were also found to have a higher
diversity of bacteria than men. There
were several hypotheses for why this may be; reduced pH in men, increased skin
thickness in men, different hormone secretion and frequency of cosmetics
applied. It was also reported that women wash their hands more often than men.
This study
explores the techniques involved with microbial identification whilst helping
to express the particularity and definition of identification of the skin’s bacterial
community. The technique detailed in
this study could be applied to deeper meta-genomic studies. This study also could help with understanding
the behaviours associated with increased hygiene and health.
Fierer et al (2008) The influence of sex, handedness and washing the diversity of hand surface bacteria. PNAS. 105:46 pp.17994-17999
In addition to this study's explanations for the higher bacterial diversity on hands compared to skin elsewhere; could it also be that hands, being a more heterogeneous habitat with crevices, folds, nails, calluses, etc, have a wider range of micro-niches in which to harbour higher diversity?
ReplyDelete