The two organisms were
first identified as parasites – The first was found in superficial marine
sediment at the mouth of the Tunquen river (coast of central Chile). The second was extracted
from mud taken at the bottom of a shallow freshwater pond near Melbourne, Australia.
They appear as ovoid
particles, and both have characteristic ultrastructural features. Assuming
viral nature, they were named Pandoravirus
salinus and Pandoravirus
dulcis
This was confirmed through observations of the
parasites’ replication cycles in Acanthamoeba
castellanii. Both species follow the same stage
characteristics which are reminiscent of M. chilensis. The tegument and
internal compartment of the particles are created simultaneously, unlike
eukaryotic DNA viruses/phages. They also demonstrate no binary fission.
Sequencing their genomes resulted
in a 2,473,870–bp sequence for P. salinus (2.47Mb) and 1,908,524-bp
sequence for P. dulcis. (1.91Mb).
Both were GC rich and had large variance in Protein-coding and
non-coding regions, setting them aside from previously sequenced giant viruses.
Aligning the genomes showed
them to be near identical, interrupted only by 4 sequences specific to P. salinus indicating the global gene
content of P. dulcis is a subset of P. salinus.
Subsequent analysis
comparing masked predicted protein sequences of P. salinus to National
Center for Biotechnology
Information nonredundant database entries yielded wide phylogenetic
distribution between eukaryotes, bacteria and viruses. This coupled with low
similarity levels, indicated no relation to previously sequenced micro-organisms.
A lack in similarity of putitative protein coding sequences within the
Megaviridae indicated they aren’t associated with the clade either.
The issue that the
irregular morphology, replication and dissimilarity to sequenced genes may mean
gene translation didn’t follow the standard genetic code and obscuring
similarities. This possibility was investigated via a proteomic analysis.
This found P. salinus thus lacks
most of the hallmark components of cellular organisms, including reduced
intracellular parasites. It does posses half
the genes for double stranded DNA viruses, but lacks a gene for major capsid
protein and also genes for typical icosahedral symmetry. Unlike most
Megaviridae, A lack of some core DNA genes confirmed that replication requires
host functions normally segregated in the nucleus. Presence of DNA processing
proteins keep it typically virus-like though.
A defining link for
Megaviridae is thought to be virally encoded amino acid–tRNA ligases, but in Pandoraviruses
these are closer to Acanthamoeba homologs.
As similar organisms were
observed (though misinterpreted) 13 years ago and from their wide distribution,
Pandoraviruses may not be rare but unobserved, due to unidentified niche and
misinterpretation of organism.
Questioning similar
misinterpreted organisms and exploring these niches with the faster and cheaper
techniques available now could lead to more discoveries similar to
Pandoravirus.
The dissimilarity to other
domains and Megaviridae represents a possible new domain, forming link between
viruses and cells. Though as so much of Pandoraviruses are not previously sequenced
this could only be said in confidence with further research and understanding.
Philippe, N., Legendre,
M., Doutre, G., Couté, Y., Poirot, O., Lescot, M., & Abergel, C. (2013).
Pandoraviruses: amoeba viruses with genomes up to 2.5 Mb reaching that of parasitic
eukaryotes. Science, 341(6143), 281-286.
Adam - for those students who aren't so familiar with Greek mythology, why do you think the authors gave it the name Pandoravirus? This discovery is going to really shake up science.
ReplyDeleteHey Colin – Using Pandora ’s Box in the name is a reference to the opening up and exploration of an exciting and unknown area of microbiology. The great potential changes and additions to our understanding of microbes and relationships between domains that such an alien organism could bring, as well as applications in biotechnology and medicine, are an awesome thought. Perhaps it also signifies the authors’ sympathies with the inevitable pains of readdressing an already well disputed classification system!
ReplyDeleteIt will be very exciting to see just how much this fascinating discovery will affect what we know, and what it will allow us to find out!